5 reasons why official tire labels offer limited information and can lead to safety issues
Tire labels can be very misleading and sometimes even dangerous when shopping for new winter tires. Discover 5 important reasons why relying only on tire label information is insufficient and can lead to you buying the wrong tires for your car or climate. For my Tesla Model 3 Performance I went to Tyre Reviews and also compared the top tire tests in my country. It is also very helpful to search your car and tires you’re considering and see how they rank. Also connecting with fellow car enthusiasts in online fora like Reddit is highly recommended.
Understanding the EU Tire Label
The EU tire label, introduced in 2012 and updated in May 2021, rates tires on key performance metrics: fuel efficiency (rolling resistance, graded A–E), wet grip (A–E, indicating braking distance on wet roads), and external rolling noise (A–C, in decibels). For winter tires, it includes optional pictograms: the 3PMSF (Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake) for severe snow conditions and an ice grip symbol for icy roads, based on ISO standards. These aim to help consumers compare tires for safety, efficiency, and environmental impact.
Why tire labels are misleading for Winter Tires
While the label provides useful data, it has significant limitations when buying new winter tires, potentially leading to poor choices for specific regional conditions. Here’s why:
- Trade-Offs Between Wet Grip and Ice Grip: Wet grip (a core rating) measures performance on wet asphalt, which is vital for milder Central European winters with rain and slush. However, high wet grip often conflicts with strong ice grip, essential for severe Nordic or Arctic winters. Tires optimized for wet conditions may underperform on ice, and vice versa—yet the label doesn’t quantify this trade-off clearly. Without explicit guidance, consumers might prioritize a high wet grip rating (e.g., A-class) and end up with tires unsuitable for icy roads, increasing accident risk.
- Regional Winter Variations Not Addressed: Winter conditions vary widely across the EU. Central Europe emphasizes snow and wet performance, while Scandinavia prioritizes ice grip. Pre-2021 labels lacked snow/ice indicators entirely, misleading Nordic buyers into selecting “European winter” tires that failed in heavy snow or ice. Even post-2021, the pictograms (snow and ice) are binary (present or absent) rather than graded, offering no nuance on performance levels. This can cause mismatches, as noted in tire industry analyses.
- Limited Scope of Testing: The label focuses on a narrow set of lab-based tests (e.g., braking on wet surfaces or standardized snow/ice), ignoring real-world factors like dry handling, aquaplaning resistance, or longevity on salted roads. For winter tires, it doesn’t cover studded options or all-season compromises. Manufacturers self-report some data, and while regulated, this can lead to optimistic ratings without independent verification for all scenarios.
- Fuel Efficiency Bias in Winter Contexts: A high efficiency rating (low rolling resistance) is great for summer or dry driving but often means softer compounds that wear faster or grip less in cold, snowy conditions below 7°C (45°F). Winter tire buyers might chase an A-rated efficient tire, unaware it sacrifices traction for fuel savings—irrelevant when safety is paramount in harsh weather.
- Overemphasis on Numbers, Underemphasis on Context: The label’s QR code links to the EPREL database for more details, but many shoppers rely on the sticker alone. It doesn’t advise on vehicle type, driving style, or local climate, potentially misleading casual buyers. Independent tests (e.g., from ADAC or Tyre Reviews) often show label ratings don’t fully predict overall winter performance.
Recommendations for Buying the best Winter Tires in your region
Next to checking the basis information on tire labels make sure you also consult with the following resources to make the best winter tire buying decision.
- Check Regional Suitability: For icy areas, look for the ice grip pictogram and cross-reference with manufacturer specs (e.g., Nokian for Nordics vs. Michelin for Central Europe).
- Consult Independent Tests: Use sources like Auto Bild or the EU’s EPREL database for full comparisons beyond the label.
- Prioritize Safety Over Efficiency: In winter, aim for B–C wet grip with confirmed snow/ice symbols; efficiency gains are minor compared to crash avoidance.
- Verify 3PMSF: This ensures basic snow capability, but pair it with user reviews for real-world feedback.
Feedback
In summary, the label excels at standardization but falls short on holistic winter guidance, risking suboptimal purchases in diverse EU climates. Always supplement it with broader research for safer driving. How do you compare the best tire reviews and tests for your specific car and climate? Let me know in the comments and I hope this video was useful. Check out also my video with tips how to best change and store your winter tires in the comfort of your own home and save a lot of money.
Please help grow my YouTube channel by subscribing or becoming a premium channel member, so I can test, review and compare new products. Please support my channel and use my Tesla promo code for a big discount on your new car or free supercharger Miles.